Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site sdcc3.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!bellcore!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcc3!ec120bgt From: ec120bgt@sdcc3.UUCP (ANDREW VARE) Newsgroups: net.rec.boat Subject: Re: Orphaned Response Message-ID: <2802@sdcc3.UUCP> Date: Mon, 29-Apr-85 18:14:09 EDT Article-I.D.: sdcc3.2802 Posted: Mon Apr 29 18:14:09 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 2-May-85 01:16:25 EDT References: <-138000@decwrl.UUCP> <51600004@hpfclo.UUCP> Organization: U.C. San Diego, Academic Computer Center Lines: 47 > > > >ANOTHER SUBJECT: Does anyone have any experience with > >one of the new non-spinnaker down wind sails. They're > >called "Spankers," "Gennikers," "Bloopers," etc. I've > >heard good and bad. > > >jaws::couture > > I don't think you meant to include the term "Blooper" here. > A Blooper is a sail used together with a spinnaker (on the > side opposite as your spinnaker pole). The greatest advantage of > using a blooper is that it tends to cancel the wild oscilations > that can lead to major knock downs in heavy following seas. Some > people believe that they offer a speed advantage, but, I've > never been convinced of this. I am convinced that they will not > give enough of a speed advantage to offset the 3second per mile > rating change (PHRF). > > Bob Schneider > {ihnp4|hplabs}!hpfcla!hpfclo!rjs *** REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR RACING TIPS *** Bob, I hasten to differ with your opinion here. I have raced on many boats [both here in San Diego and up in the SF bay] and have found bloopers to be very fast on certain occasions, notably during heavy weather as you mentioned. Considering that a knockdown may take a minute or two to recover from [from knockdown to refill to course correction to retrim] and in many conditions several knockdowns may lurk in the shadows,[especially in the ocean] a blooper may be a very effective way to gain stability. Fewer knockdowns also means less wear and tear on your kites in the long haul, which keeps them in a more competitive state [read:faster]. On the 1983 Cabo San Lucas race we saw 18 kt. over the deck, and were popping off 16's and 18's on the speedo. Our main sail combination was a running 1.5 oz. and a 1.5 blooper. Without the blooper we would've needed to sail 10-12 degrees higher to maintain stability, and I'm sure would've cost us several places in the standings. My point is that the blooper allowed us to INCREASE VMG, which is the relevant factor on any point of sail, and retain control while sailing lower and faster. Andrew T. Vare