Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site fortune.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!fortune!brower
From: brower@fortune.UUCP (Richard Brower)
Newsgroups: net.religion.christian
Subject: Re: Some Information on the Baptism of the Holy Spirit
Message-ID: <5217@fortune.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 25-Apr-85 17:24:26 EST
Article-I.D.: fortune.5217
Posted: Thu Apr 25 17:24:26 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 27-Apr-85 03:49:50 EST
References: <1379@vax3.fluke.UUCP> <386@ho95b.UUCP>
Reply-To: brower@fortune.UUCP (Richard brower)
Organization: Fortune Systems, Redwood City, CA
Lines: 8
Summary: 

As a youth I was much involved with Pentacostals and other fundamentalist
sects, and I always wondered why the original "speaking in tongues" was
understandable to the people spoken to, and "speaking in tongues", as
practiced today, seems not to be in any recognisable language, and is
not at all understandable.  Is there a reason for this?
-- 
Richard A. Brower		Fortune Systems
{ihnp4,ucbvax!amd,hpda,sri-unix,harpo}!fortune!brower