Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site sfmag.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!mhuxn!mhuxm!sftig!sftri!sfmag!samet From: samet@sfmag.UUCP (A.I.Samet) Newsgroups: net.religion.jewish Subject: De-Escalating the Egg Message-ID: <559@sfmag.UUCP> Date: Wed, 1-May-85 15:03:18 EDT Article-I.D.: sfmag.559 Posted: Wed May 1 15:03:18 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 3-May-85 23:30:46 EDT References: <123@unc.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Summit, NJ Lines: 55 > From a Jewish perspective, I see two possible interpretations > of anti-semitism: > > My interpretation: > > 1) Due to wicked forces, the world is unjust and arbitrary. > > Inference: Anti-semitism has meaning. > Result: This interpretation yields no insight on how to fight > anti-semitism, but at least acknowleges it as unjust. > > Yitzchok's interpretation: > > 2) God is punishing the Jews for not being "better". > > Note: God does not similarly punish the gentiles. > Inference: The gentiles are somehow "better" than we are. > Result: This interpretation leads to Jewish self-hatred, etc. > ^^^^^^^ 1) Many Jews may feel that the world is "unjust and arbitrary" but it is misleading to call this a "Jewish perspective", because it appears to contradict the fundamental Jewish tenet that there is a just G*d. The classical Jewish approach acknowledges our inability to understand G*d's ways rather than denying His existence, claiming that He has no control over evil, or seeing Him as unjust. The justice may be hidden from us because we don't know the reasons behind G*d's actions, or because there is a settling of scores in Olam Haba. If you argue that yours is a "Jewish atheistic" perspective, this would at least serve to clarify the basis of our disagreement. However, I was presenting a Torah approach. Are you saying that your aprroach is consistent with the Torah? If so, what are your bases for that assertion? 2) I did not say or imply that the goyim are not punished too.Nor did I suggest that anti-semitism has no meaning (on a surface level) or that it is not unjust (from a human perspective). I don't know why you attribute these ideas to me. The inferences you draw about my beliefs are therefore incorrect. 3) The broader perspective I am advocating does not exclude practical countermeasures against antisemitism or non- metaphysical insights, as you seem to think. I stated this several times. Why do you keep missing what I say? 4) The key point I tried to emphasize was that there is a religious dimension which adds perspective to our understanding of antisemitism, and that an effective solution to the problem must recognize that we invite it by assimilating. This adds an important dimension to our understanding of Nazism, one which has been neglected, perhaps because it is so disturbing. Yitzchok Samet