Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site hyper.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!stolaf!umn-cs!hyper!brust From: brust@hyper.UUCP (Steven Brust) Newsgroups: net.sf-lovers,net.books Subject: Re: THE DRAGON WAITING Message-ID: <167@hyper.UUCP> Date: Fri, 26-Apr-85 11:26:56 EDT Article-I.D.: hyper.167 Posted: Fri Apr 26 11:26:56 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 3-May-85 03:12:20 EDT References: <667@ahutb.UUCP> <270@tilt.FUN> Organization: Network Systems Corp., Mpls., Mn. Lines: 23 Xref: watmath net.sf-lovers:7331 net.books:1747 > > ............................................................... Ford > is a *very* precise, able, and efficient writer, one of the best > wordsmiths I've ever read. He tends to write just enough to create the > effect he's after -- and no more. He also tends to give the readers > just enough information to figure out what's going on and why -- and no > more. This kind of precision in writing is very difficult to pull off > because if the writer miscalculates, he can leave the reader very > confused. On the other hand, if he does things just right, he can > leave the reader with an amazing sense of completion when the focal idea > of the entire novel makes itself clearer and clearer as the last few > chapter slowly unfold. In THE DRAGON WAITING, Ford does it just right. > > Ray Chen > princeton!tilt!chenr I completely agree with you on all points. The thing about Ford is that, in most cases, one must read him twice to fully understand what is going on. Usually, I'm tempted to call this a weakness. In the case of writers like Ford and Gene Wolfe, its okay, because there is so much in the book to enjoy even when the plot isn't fully clear, and because rereading them is such a pleasure. -- SKZB