Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site crystal.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!uwvax!crystal!slana From: slana@crystal.UUCP Newsgroups: net.auto,net.flame,net.kids,net.singles Subject: Re: Seat belts Message-ID: <448@crystal.UUCP> Date: Wed, 24-Apr-85 11:20:06 EST Article-I.D.: crystal.448 Posted: Wed Apr 24 11:20:06 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 26-Apr-85 21:54:32 EST References: <1299@drusd.UUCP> <3600@alice.UUCP> <105@daisy.UUCP> Organization: U of Wisconsin CS Dept Lines: 30 Xref: linus net.auto:5430 net.flame:8551 net.kids:1110 net.singles:5795 *** *** Many people have already brought up the higher insurance rates brought on by the ~85% of people on the road who feel that the discomfort/inconvenience of safety belts outweigh the risk of destroying a windshield with a face, but how 'bout other factors where their refusal for protection affects others? Consider this - I wear safety belts religiously. The government has talked about mandatory passive restraints in U.S. manufactured cars (b.t.w., I have no idea what the current status of this issue is, perhaps someone could follow up?). If airbags are eventually required, I will have to pay somewher around $600 extra on a car for a feature which is not as effective as the safety belts I already wear (the effectiveness in front end crashes can be debated, but airbags offer no protection in side or rear crashes, can go off in a glancing collision blocking the drivers view from avoiding a second collision). (I am relatively new to this newsgroup, and apologize if the airbag issue has already been discussed to death). Added comment - I am a big auto racing fan, and have seen guys survive head on collisions with walls at 180+ mph. When I see the boys at Indy/Daytona/etc. come up with a better idea than belts, maybe I'll consider it, but until then I'll be strapped in for even the 1 block drive for groceries... -Chuck generic disclaimer - these are merely the rantings of a madman who assumes all responsibility for its contents.