Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version nyu B notes v1.5 12/10/84; site acf4.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!acf4!mms1646
From: mms1646@acf4.UUCP (Michael M. Sykora)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: Seat belts (please move exclusively to net.auto)
Message-ID: <1560043@acf4.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 4-May-85 19:19:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: acf4.1560043
Posted: Sat May  4 19:19:00 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 7-May-85 20:43:49 EDT
References: <317@rtech.ARPA>
Organization: New York University
Lines: 12


>herbie@watdcsu.UUCP (Herb Chong [DCS]) /  9:56 am  May  1, 1985 */

>a few years back, the Mathematical Games column of Scientific American
>did a little game theory analysis of the system of plain majority votes
>in decisions.  i forget the date, but in essence, it concluded that
>majority votes were fine if you were one of the majority, but poorly
>represented any minorities.  
>
>Herb Chong...

Why in the world did this require "game theory analysis?"