Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site dolqci.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!dolqci!mike
From: mike@dolqci.UUCP (Mike Stalnaker)
Newsgroups: net.startrek
Subject: Re: Captain Dunsel
Message-ID: <309@dolqci.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 3-May-85 08:37:54 EDT
Article-I.D.: dolqci.309
Posted: Fri May  3 08:37:54 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 4-May-85 07:46:07 EDT
References: <712@druor.UUCP>
Organization: US. Dept. of Labor, Emp. Train. Adm. Q. C. Group , Wash DC.
Lines: 20

> 
> 
> Does this mean that the Heavy Cruiser Class may be the Constitution
> Class since its number is NCC (Naval Construction Contract) 1700?
> The Star Fleet Tech manual refers to them as the MK IX class as 
> origionally authorized by the Articles of Federation.

	I don't know exactly where, but in several places (in
literature), the class is referred to as the Constitution Class.


-- 

  Mike Stalnaker  UUCP:{decvax!decuac,cbosgd,seismo}!dolqci!mike
		  AT&T:202-376-2593
		  USPS:601 D. St. NW, Room 7122, Washington, DC, 20213
		
		  "Never appeal to a man's better nature. He may not
		   have one. Appeal to his better interests instead"
						--Lazarus Long