Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site utah-cs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!pwa-b!utah-gr!utah-cs!brownc
From: brownc@utah-cs.UUCP (Eric C. Brown)
Newsgroups: net.taxes
Subject: Re: SS deduction
Message-ID: <3310@utah-cs.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 25-Apr-85 11:06:02 EST
Article-I.D.: utah-cs.3310
Posted: Thu Apr 25 11:06:02 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 27-Apr-85 03:14:56 EST
References: <5762@duke.UUCP> <121@pyuxh.UUCP> <632@ssc-vax.UUCP> <434@hou5h.UUCP> <2695@harpo.UUCP>
Reply-To: brownc@utah-cs.UUCP (Eric C. Brown)
Organization: Univ of Utah CS Dept
Lines: 20
Summary: 


In article <2695@harpo.UUCP> jrl@harpo.UUCP (jrl) writes:
>Of course there are some who could not afford even 1K for such a thing, those
>people should not have any children anyway, since they are in dire straights.

Surprise!! Guess what social class usually has the most children?  You guessed
it, the lower social classes.  Usually, the lower the social class, the more
children per family.  Besides, one thing that most New Righters (and I assume
that jrl is a New Righter, judging from the way that he/she writes) tend to 
forget:  Social Security was created for a VERY good reason; banks, pension
funds, and so forth were failing left and right during the 1930's.  Anybody
who thinks that banks can't fail again hasn't looked at the Third World debt
level recently.

Eric C. Brown

brownc@utah-cs

...!seismo!utah-cs!brownc

Execute People, not Programs!!