Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site daemen.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!rochester!rocksanne!sunybcs!daemen!fung
From: fung@daemen.UUCP (Kenneth Worzel Fung)
Newsgroups: net.tv.drwho
Subject: Re: Re: Companions
Message-ID: <530@daemen.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 30-Apr-85 16:23:11 EDT
Article-I.D.: daemen.530
Posted: Tue Apr 30 16:23:11 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 3-May-85 08:05:51 EDT
References: <568@wjh12.UUCP> <229@spock.UUCP>
Organization: Daemen College, Amherst NY
Lines: 29

> Let's have a new debate:  Was Katarina really a companion?

> Come on, let's have your opinions on Katarina- they don't have to be
> firsthand, do you think she, and maybe Yates and the Master could enter
> into it too, do you think they were companions or not?

*** REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR DALEK SOUP ***

	Yes, by the John Nathan Turner definition, Katarina was a companion,
	so was Mike Yates, the Master, Benton, and scores of others.

	It's quite simple, if any character associated with the Doctor for
	more than one story, they are considered a companion. Yates was
	considered a companion, so was the Master, neither of which ever
	stepped foot into the TARDIS (The Master I was considering was 
	Roger Delgado (sp.).

	Now, do you think Davros fits under the same exception?

	Even more bizzare, Can you imagine a new Doctor, as  John Cleese!?!
-- 
          		Kenneth "Worzel" Fung

		"For the Eternal Space--Mobile Suit Gundam"

UUCP : {decvax/dual/rocksanne/watmath/rocksvax} !sunybcs!daemen!fung

	"...to be destroyed by an Earthling, a mere girl, an American even, 
	would make him the laughing stock of the Universe!"