Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 GARFIELD 20/11/84; site garfield.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcsri!garfield!lionel
From: lionel@garfield.UUCP (Lionel H. Moser)
Newsgroups: can.politics
Subject: Re: Inflamatory comparison involving Jews, Nazis, Zundel, Keegstra
Message-ID: <2898@garfield.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 13-May-85 11:56:28 EDT
Article-I.D.: garfield.2898
Posted: Mon May 13 11:56:28 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 13-May-85 13:32:10 EDT
References: <638@lsuc.UUCP> <1061@ubc-cs.UUCP>, <266@looking.UUCP>, <5589@utzoo.UUCP> <267@looking.UUCP>
Organization: Memorial U. of Nfld. C.S. Dept., St. John's
Lines: 22


   Brad Templton <267@looking.UUCP> writes:
> ...
>
> Sometimes an attack of words is so immediate that it can not be defended
> against in kind.  Shouting "FIRE" to cause panic is such an attempt.
> Those who do it are aware that their attack can't be countered with words.
> Men like Zundel are not in such a position.

   Zundel and his ilk don't *have* to attack Jews directly. Their aim is
to incite others to do so. Directly.

> 
> Are we so foolish and irresponsible that we must be protected from the
> ideas of others?  Even when we have been conditioned with the "never again"
> message since birth?  (Baby boomers all have.)  Is Zundel such a danger
> we must lock him up?

   Yes. Never again.

Lionel Moser, CS Dept., M.U.N., St. John's, Nfld.
utcsri!garfield!lionel