Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site lsuc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcs!lsuc!jimomura
From: jimomura@lsuc.UUCP (Jim Omura)
Newsgroups: can.politics
Subject: Re: Zundel etc.
Message-ID: <646@lsuc.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 13-May-85 19:25:07 EDT
Article-I.D.: lsuc.646
Posted: Mon May 13 19:25:07 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 13-May-85 20:22:23 EDT
References: <638@lsuc.UUCP> <558@mnetor.UUCP> <641@lsuc.UUCP> <584@mnetor.UUCP>
Reply-To: jimomura@lsuc.UUCP (Jim Omura)
Distribution: can
Organization: Law Society of Upper Canada, Toronto
Lines: 16
Summary: Not a big dissagreement


     I think we aren't dissagreeing by and large.  I
just believe that the jury decided what they were supposed
to decide in this case.  I wasn't on the jury and I didn't
hear the 'jury charge'.  As such I believe the trial went as it
was supposed to until I've been shown evidence that something
improper or different occurred.
 
     Morganthaler was a different matter.  I know for a fact
what was said by the defence counsel during his summation
(or at least I *did* know--I forget now).
 
     Heck.  I'd pick a programmer for jury duty.
 
                                  Jim O.