Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site uw-beaver
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!laser-lovers
From: laser-lovers@uw-beaver
Newsgroups: fa.laser-lovers
Subject: Re: confidentiality - a tricky question
Message-ID: <1190@uw-beaver>
Date: Sun, 19-May-85 22:09:41 EDT
Article-I.D.: uw-beave.1190
Posted: Sun May 19 22:09:41 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 21-May-85 05:43:15 EDT
Sender: daemon@uw-beaver
Organization: U of Washington Computer Science
Lines: 10

From: Brian Reid <reid@Glacier>

Actually, Bob, my message could not have given you any new information
because I do not have any information. I don't know the results of Les'
comparisons, and I wanted to make sure I got my note of suspicion out
before I learned the results, lest it look as though I was playing sour
grapes. Given Les' recent crusade to disparage Apple LaserWriters, I
was fairly confident that he included them, and given the fact that he
is continuing to talk about the results, I was fairly sure that his own
brand did best in the tests, but that is all just speculation.