Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 4/3/85; site ukma.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ukma!sambo
From: sambo@ukma.UUCP (Inventor of micro-S)
Newsgroups: net.lang,net.arch
Subject: Re: Assembly VS HOL: Having it both ways
Message-ID: <1739@ukma.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 9-May-85 03:07:58 EDT
Article-I.D.: ukma.1739
Posted: Thu May  9 03:07:58 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 10-May-85 00:44:37 EDT
References: <1220@topaz.ARPA> <511@terak.UUCP> <1440@amdahl.UUCP> <518@terak.UUCP> <1163@ecsvax.UUCP>
Organization: U of Kentucky, Mathematical Sciences, Lexington KY
Lines: 7
Xref: watmath net.lang:1570 net.arch:1166
Summary: What are some of problems with iAPX86 assembly language?

In article <1163@ecsvax.UUCP>, dgary@ecsvax.UUCP (D Gary Grady) writes:
> It might be noted that advantage of assembly language is only in its
> power to control exactly what the object format will be (with the
> possible exception of some assemblers for Intel 80x8x processors, which
> still tend to surprise me with their inventive code productions).

What are some of these inventive code productions?