Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site druxu.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!mtuxo!drutx!druxu!mohler
From: mohler@druxu.UUCP (MohlerDS)
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: Cartridge Comparison
Message-ID: <1521@druxu.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 13-May-85 17:15:58 EDT
Article-I.D.: druxu.1521
Posted: Mon May 13 17:15:58 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 14-May-85 20:43:45 EDT
References: <970@ulysses.UUCP>, <1369@watdcsu.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Information Systems Laboratories, Denver
Lines: 20

Herb,
	I, for one am very interested in the cartridge comparison
information you mentioned. In addition, has audioscene or the
U of Waterloo done any controlled comparison or detailed testing
of high end speakers like:
1) Snell A/III or A/II
2) B&W 801F, 802F or B&W 808
3) Quad ESL-63
4) Appogee Ribbons (either model)
5) KEF R105/II
6) Audiostatic ES240-MD
7) Other worthy high end candidates.
	Depending on whether others are interested, I would like to 
get the details of such tests either on the NET or by mail. I am also 
willing to post or share by mail, details of some cartridge/arm comparisons
I have conducted if there is any interest.

			David S. Mohler
			AT&T-ISL @ Denver
			!druxu!mohler