Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site phoenix.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!harpo!whuxlm!whuxl!houxm!ihnp4!phoenix!josie
From: josie@phoenix.UUCP (Jack Gross)
Newsgroups: net.auto
Subject: Re: Auto Alarm Systems
Message-ID: <1174@phoenix.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 17-May-85 09:45:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: phoenix.1174
Posted: Fri May 17 09:45:00 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 17-May-85 23:56:39 EDT
References: <333@lasspvax.UUCP> <403@enmasse.UUCP>
Distribution: na
Organization: AT&T Information Systems, Lincroft NJ
Lines: 30


	I must commend you for recommending the Chapman lock.



1)	First of all how much did they pay you for it !!!

2)	If you want to recommend something you should always make
sure you know what you are talking about.


	The Chapman lock is not very effective. I have heard of many
people getting their car stolen and the Chapman lock is just cut right
out of the car. A couple of years ago Consumers Reports rated car
security systems (not just alarms) and the Chapman lock came out near 
the bottom of the heap. As a matter of fact the top rated "alarm" was
a device that sells for less than $100 and is a passive devices.

	In the Big Apple everyone has Chapman locks and more cars are 
stolen in NY than any other place. It just goes to show you what a
little advertising can do for even the biggest piece of junk !!!






				Jack Gross
			        ATTIS Lincroft NJ