Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 4/15/85; site cae780.UUCP Path: utzoo!utcs!lsuc!pesnta!amdcad!cae780!gordon From: gordon@cae780.UUCP (Brian Gordon) Newsgroups: net.consumers,net.invest,net.misc Subject: Stopping automatic payments (long) Message-ID: <835@cae780.UUCP> Date: Thu, 9-May-85 12:44:18 EDT Article-I.D.: cae780.835 Posted: Thu May 9 12:44:18 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 10-May-85 11:59:40 EDT Distribution: na Organization: CAE Systems, Sunnyvale, CA Lines: 45 Xref: utcs net.consumers:2230 net.invest:613 net.misc:7653 It looks like I'm headed for a battle in small claims court, so I thought I'd ask you netters if you think my position is reasonable ... Several years ago, when I bought new life insurance, I signed an authorization to allow the insurance company to deduct a monthly premium from my checking account at my credit union. This has gone smoothly. Recently I decided to change carriers, and the agent (who represented both carriers) told me to issue a "stop payment" order on the monthly deduction to cancel the old policy. This appears to be the most common way to do it, and indeed it is how I had canceled the previous policy years ago, when the payments were being deducted from my bank checking account. I dropped in at the credit union one lunch time and ended up with a new teller who did not know how to do it (stop payment on an automatic deduction). He asked the supervisor, who said that it could not be done -- I had to contact the insurance company and tell them to stop submitting them. It didn't sound right to me at the time, but three other people were waiting in the car in the parking lot, so I didn't stay around to argue. After thinking about it, I wrote to them that night, pointing out that there had to be a misunderstanding somewhere, since they were telling me, in effect, that they were going to give somebody money out of my account even after I had informed them that such a withdrawl was no longer authorized. Three weeks later, I received my letter back from them with a handwritten notice that, since I had authorized the deduction through the insurance company, I had to stop it through them, too. I wrote to ask for a written statement from an officer to the effect that, even though I had canceled the authorization to give my money to this insurance company, they intended to continue doing so against my wishes. I have not yet received an answer, but they did deduct last month's payment, after having received my letter telling them not to do so. Am I right to believe that I can now go to small claims court and get the amount they "stole" from my account? Am I missing something significant that makes their position reasonable? I have notified them, in writing, that the amount shown as a deduction on my most recent statement is an error, and asking them to restore it to my account. Hopefully, their answer to that request or my earlier request for a written statement of their intent to ignore my cancellation of the automatic deduction authorization would be all the evidence I need, wouldn't it? FROM: Brian G. Gordon, CAE Systems UUCP: {ihnp4, decvax!decwrl}!amd!cae780!gordon {nsc, resonex, qubix, hplabs, leadsv, teklds}!cae780!gordon