Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site sdcrdcf.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!bellcore!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!barryg
From: barryg@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Lee Gold)
Newsgroups: net.flame,net.consumers
Subject: Coca Cola Syrup
Message-ID: <1954@sdcrdcf.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 7-May-85 21:16:40 EDT
Article-I.D.: sdcrdcf.1954
Posted: Tue May  7 21:16:40 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 10-May-85 02:19:11 EDT
References: <1432@cornell.UUCP> <3686@alice.UUCP> <324@h-sc1.UUCP> <830@bunker.UUCP>
Reply-To: barryg@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Lee Gold)
Organization: System Development Corp. R+D, Santa Monica
Lines: 13
Xref: watmath net.flame:9792 net.consumers:2241
Summary: 

The vitamin section of my local SAV-ON (drugstore-emporium) has a lot of
strange stuff.  Cod liver oil and ipecac and ... Coca Cola Syrup.
This last is NOT in the familiar Coke logo; it does not have a trademark.
Then again, why would the manufacturer dare to use that title without
Coke's consent?

We're thinking of buying some, diluting it with carbonated water, and
seeing how it tastes.  (Or has anyone already tried this?)  It also might
be nice mixed in with home made ice cream.  The real question is whether
it uses the new or the old formula--and whether it resists aging any
better than the tuff in bottles/cans.

--Lee Gold