Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site shark.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!orca!shark!hutch
From: hutch@shark.UUCP (Stephen Hutchison)
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Re: no wut i hayt?
Message-ID: <1384@shark.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 8-May-85 20:05:55 EDT
Article-I.D.: shark.1384
Posted: Wed May  8 20:05:55 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 10-May-85 03:24:09 EDT
References: <1676@gondor.UUCP> <578@abnji.UUCP> <1681@gondor.UUCP>
Reply-To: hutch@shark.UUCP
Organization: Tektronix, Wilsonville OR
Lines: 46

In article <1681@gondor.UUCP> weiss@gondor.UUCP writes:
>> >There is nothing wrong with singing!  But singing a song about being a real
>> >man in a high falsetto voice is what I consider to be a contradiction.
>> 
>> I guess you don't like Boy George. :-)
>> -- 
>> James C Armstrong, Jnr.   ihnp4!abnji!nyssa
>
>The only thing I like about Boy George is to imagine him tied to the 2
>lead cars at the Indy 500 and have them enter a fierce battle for second
>place!  Either that or have his nuts (unless he's had them cut off, as I 
>suspect) to the lauch pad and his arms tied to the next shuttle!
>hehehehehe......

All right, children, enough is enough, and besides, neither idea would
work.  The exhaust gasses from the launch would vaporize Mr. O'Dowd before
he got a chance to be ripped into painful pieces, and tying him between
two race cars would also endanger the drivers of those cars, which is
unneccessary.  As for questions about his masculinity, why are YOU afraid?
He's not going to reproduce himself, having expressed a preference for
men dressed as women...  Unless you dress as a woman.  Now, y'all already
been labelled as geeks, are you admitting to being TRANSVESTITE GEEKS? 
Wait a minute.  Back to ol' Goy Borge...  Maybe some woman dressed as a
man dressed as a woman might FOOL him...  Hmm.  Any UK non-geek recipients
of this flame, please consider this as incitement to commit a natural
act (I'll let y'all figure out for yourselves what this act would
be, considering my statements in prior postings on this topic as to the
meet and proper treatment of geeks;  Disregard the fact that GeorgeBoy is
not a pencil-necked geek; wide-mouth funny-dressin' geek season opens soon.)

>PS: Yes, I wish Michael Jackson a painful death, too.
>
>-- 
>I don't practice what I preach because 
>I am not the type of person I'm preaching to.
>
>Michael S. Weiss                               BITNET:  weiss@psuvaxg.bitnet

So you, mister WHITE, wish a painful death on that pore fellow what has been
suffering from anorexia... Just because his mama gives him birth control
pills in his pablum doesn't mean he necessarily deserves a painful death.
A painless death ought to be enough for him, RIGHT?

What ever happened to your sister Janet?

-Hutch