Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.PCS 1/10/84; site mtuxo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!mtuxo!45223wc
From: 45223wc@mtuxo.UUCP (w.cambre)
Newsgroups: net.consumers,net.flame,net.legal
Subject: RE: re: Coca Cola
Message-ID: <691@mtuxo.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 10-May-85 20:06:33 EDT
Article-I.D.: mtuxo.691
Posted: Fri May 10 20:06:33 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 11-May-85 04:06:24 EDT
Organization: AT&T Information Systems Labs, Holmdel NJ
Lines: 8
Xref: watmath net.consumers:2257 net.flame:9830 net.legal:1676


Lee Gold IS correct in questioning Coca Cola as a trade mark of Coke.
The trademark is spelled Coca-Cola.  If the add said Coca Cola and it
isn't Coke, is this a trademark infringement? Or is it OK if they
don't stick in a hyphen?
 - Bill Cambre   ATTISL   20052354   mtuxo!45223wc

P.S.  Hey Lee, was it really Coke?