Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ucla-cs.ARPA
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!talcott!panda!genrad!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!trwrb!trwrba!cepu!ucla-cs!srt
From: srt@ucla-cs.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Re: Personal Defense, rebuttals
Message-ID: <5317@ucla-cs.ARPA>
Date: Thu, 9-May-85 14:52:55 EDT
Article-I.D.: ucla-cs.5317
Posted: Thu May  9 14:52:55 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 12-May-85 11:24:15 EDT
References: <395@ttidcc.UUCP> <5299@ucla-cs.ARPA>
Reply-To: srt@ucla-cs.UUCP (Scott Turner)
Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department
Lines: 21

In article <5299@ucla-cs.ARPA> reiher@ucla-cs.UUCP (Peter Reiher) writes:
>
>                ...It still won't change anyone's minds, but at least we all
>might learn something.
>

Okay, Reiher, you worthless slime, time to nip this in the bud.  I don't
read net.flame to learn anything, and if you think you are going to start
a tradition of posting articles that actually back up an opinion with
references ("Scholary treatments are suspect", my ass.  Scholarly treatments
were good enough for my Dad, and they're damn well good enough for me.  The
nerve!), well you've got another think coming, boy.  I know where you live,
and if you dare post one article to net.flame with a reference to anything
more scholarly than the Sniglets book, well, I'll just visit your apartment
with my friend Guido.  And we won't JUST kill you, Peter...we'll take away
your VCR and all your movie passes.

    Scott R. Turner
    ARPA:  srt@LOCUS.UCLA.EDU
    UUCP:  ...!{cepu,ihnp4,trwspp,ucbvax}!ucla-cs!srt
    SPUDNET: ...eye%srt@russet.spud