Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site aecom.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!aecom!eliovson
From: eliovson@aecom.UUCP (Moshe Eliovson)
Newsgroups: net.games.frp
Subject: Re: Alignment
Message-ID: <1557@aecom.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 9-May-85 00:53:56 EDT
Article-I.D.: aecom.1557
Posted: Thu May  9 00:53:56 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 10-May-85 21:38:34 EDT
References: <1139@cbosgd.UUCP>
Organization: Albert Einstein Coll. of Med., NY
Lines: 32

*** UltraChaos Rules ***

 Three issues here:

	1) Philosophy is nice but let's work out how different
	   alignments interact.  Keep in mind that there are
	   always exceptions.  Is Chaotic Dominant or Good/Neutral/Evil ?

	2) Diametrically opposed and similar distates.  What is
	   the reaction.  For a powerful paladin it may be avoiding
	   the brothel or for extreme situations the sword.  For
	   a lowly plebe it may be creating a society protest against
	   the brothel and distinctly avoiding the sword case.
	   Would a LN be more opposed to being with a CN than with
	   either a CG or CE?

	3) Before you ever make a judgement ask yourself:
	   Is it a question of alignment or MORALITY?!
	   A NG thief stumbles upon a large treasure while
	   scouting for the party.  He reports a still sizeable
	   1/3rd.  In my opinion this isn't evil but rather
	   immoral.

	   You might say Evil is disregard of life and Neutral
	   disregard of personal rights?  NO.  That's lawful's
	   area.

	   I too would appreciate working out an almost clearcut
	   system with everyone- but it's going to take a while.

	   Moshe Eliovson
	   philabs!aecom!eliovson