Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ucla-cs.ARPA
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!talcott!panda!genrad!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!trwrb!trwrba!cepu!ucla-cs!srt
From: srt@ucla-cs.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.games.frp
Subject: Re: Wars in FRP
Message-ID: <5420@ucla-cs.ARPA>
Date: Tue, 14-May-85 15:43:47 EDT
Article-I.D.: ucla-cs.5420
Posted: Tue May 14 15:43:47 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 17-May-85 04:33:24 EDT
References: <1478@aecom.UUCP> <1852@topaz.ARPA> <5096@ukc.UUCP> <5266@ucla-cs.ARPA> <5120@ukc.UUCP>
Reply-To: srt@ucla-cs.UUCP (Scott Turner)
Distribution: net
Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department
Lines: 18

In article <5120@ukc.UUCP> ncg@ukc.UUCP (Nige Gale) writes:
>
>I assure you it would not be more interesting than <insert the most boring
>thing you can imagine here>, except to me, perhaps.
>Suffice it to say that Wars are quite fun to GM every so often.
>

I'm quite serious.  I'm interested in reading write-ups of action in
various people's campaigns.  Reading an interesting write-up from a high
power campaign would do more towards convincing me that such campaigns
are worthwhile than four pages of arguments.  Likewise, in the case of
Nige's campaign, it might go to show me why wars are fun in a campaign,
and how they can be handled by the DM.

    Scott R. Turner
    ARPA:  (now) srt@UCLA-LOCUS.ARPA  (soon) srt@LOCUS.UCLA.EDU
    UUCP:  ...!{cepu,ihnp4,trwspp,ucbvax}!ucla-cs!srt
    SPUDNET: ...eye%srt@russet.spud