Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 5/3/83; site ukc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!mcvax!ukc!ncg
From: ncg@ukc.UUCP (N.C.Gale)
Newsgroups: net.games.pbm
Subject: Re: Diplomacy question
Message-ID: <5123@ukc.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 17-May-85 10:26:40 EDT
Article-I.D.: ukc.5123
Posted: Fri May 17 10:26:40 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 13-May-85 00:20:00 EDT
References: <1757@watcgl.UUCP> <1050@uwmacc.UUCP>
Reply-To: ncg@ukc.UUCP (Nige Gale)
Organization: Computing Laboratory, U of Kent at Canterbury, UK
Lines: 13


Sure it's legal, and I think logical too:
there's no reason why two armies in attack should be able to break
two armies in defence.
If there are three armies in attack, that's a different matter,
the defence cardcastles

-NIge Gale


PS. Aren't there any pbms over this side of the British Ocean?
Diplomacy or otherwise (not least Machiavelli)