Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!brl-tgr!tgr!wmartin@Almsa-2 From: wmartin@Almsa-2 (Will Martin -- AMXAL-RI) Newsgroups: net.ham-radio Subject: TV DXing discussion from Videotech Message-ID: <10545@brl-tgr.ARPA> Date: Thu, 9-May-85 14:05:07 EDT Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.10545 Posted: Thu May 9 14:05:07 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 11-May-85 08:17:22 EDT Sender: news@brl-tgr.ARPA Lines: 127 The following discussion has recently arisen on the Videotech list; I thought Info-Hams (& net.ham-radio) people might be interested in it: Date: Mon, 06 May 85 09:34:28 CDT From: mooremj@Eglin-Vax Subject: What is the maximum range of VHF reception? To: videotech@Sri-Csl Questions about (gasp! how primitive) broadcast TV. I live in an area where, due to local politics, we do not have cable TV and probably won't for a few years. Realizing this, I bought a 30-foot mast, the biggest antenna I could find, a rotator and a pre-amplifier; I also live on top of a hill, so my configuration is pretty close to optimum. After experimenting I find that my maximum range for a good VHF picture is about 200 miles (New Orleans) on cloudy days, 150 miles on clear days. Occasionally I get a picture from a Birmingham station (230 miles), but it's not reliable. Now I thought that was pretty good; but several of the old-timers in this area swear that one can sometimes receive stations in the Yucatan, which is over 400 miles away across the Gulf. Question #1: Is this possible? I know some Mexican stations are much more powerful than American stations. Question #2: My antenna has what is called an "FM filter", but I still get blasted away by a station at 88.1 MHz when I try to watch Channel 6. (The FM station is 50 miles away, channel 6 is 180 miles away, in opposite directions.) Is there any way I can further reduce the FM signal without affecting Channel 6? Question #3: Is my 200-mile limit the best that can be done? What IS the extreme range of VHF reception? Thanks in advance, Marty Moore (MOOREMJ@EGLIN-VAX.ARPA) Date: Tue, 7 May 85 3:40:59 CDT From: Will Martin -- AMXAL-RI To: mooremj@Eglin-Vax.arpa cc: videotech@Sri-Csl.arpa Subject: Re: What is the maximum range of VHF reception? TV DXing (which is what you are really talking about) is a hobby in its own right. I have never indulged, myself, but a friend, Glenn Hauser, is one of the nation's top TV DXers (he once had an article on the subject published in TV Guide, and also has had articles in various radio-related publications, like the World Radio-TV Handbook). There are several methods for long-distance propagation of high-frequency (VHF and up) signals, such as "tropospheric ducting", "Sporadic E", and "meteor scatter". (I don't know much more about these than the names, though I know the last one involves catching the short-term reflections of signals off the ionized trails of meteors -- that one always struck me as fairly exotic...) There is a club devoted to this hobby -- if I recall correctly, the name is the Worldwide TV/FM DX Club, and their bulletin is The VHF/UHF Digest. I don't have their address here at work; if you or others are interested, I can look it up and post it. (You can find it in a back issue of Popular Communications, if a local library gets that magazine...) Anyway, Glenn and many other TV DXers have had quite long-range catches. One I recall offhand, when he was in the USAF in Thailand, was when he picked up Saudi Arabia. Of course, equatorial conditions are different from those here in the temperate zone, but that can give you an idea. I wouldn't be surprised if there was NO "theoretical" limit on the distance you could pick up a signal -- it would all depend on the propagation conditions, local electrical noise and interference, transmitter power, and antenna configuration at both ends... So the maximum would be 12,500 miles or so, on the opposite side of the globe. And there are ways to receive signals via the "long path", which means going the "wrong" way around the earth, which could increase that [and, if you figure multi-circumferential paths, you can go up indefinitely!]. (This, of course, only refers to terrestrial transmission & reception; we've seen TV pictures from Saturn, after all...) Will Martin ARPA/MILNET: wmartin@almsa-1.ARPA USENET: seismo!brl-bmd!wmartin Date: Thu, 9 May 85 9:37:18 CDT From: Will Martin -- AMXAL-RI To: mooremj@eglin-vax, videotech@sri-csl Subject: Re: What is the maximum range of VHF reception? I looked up the data on the TV (and FM & public-service stuff, too) DXing club. Here it is: Worldwide TV/FM DX Association PO Box 514 Buffalo, NY 14205 Their monthly bulletin is The VHF/UHF Digest. Sample copies were $1.25 as of the 1983 copy I happen to have (though the address was verified as still being OK in the 1985 World Radio TV Handbook). They also put out a pamphlet as an introduction to the hobby; if you are at all interested in this (and the equipment investment mentioned indicates a definite interest!), it would be worth sending them $2.00 (again, the price as of 1983, but probably still good) for a copy of "Beyond Shortwave". This should answer any questions about modes of propagation, expected distances of reception under typical conditions, and general info on receivers and antennas. The monthly bulletins consist mainly of reception reports and news about new and changed stations, call letters, powers, etc. There are sometimes equipment reviews; the issues I bought back in 1983 had some info on the then-new Carver tuner. Equipment reviews in this sort of publication can be quite useful; since they are informal, written by people who own the gear, and often are printed after the equipment has been around a while, they contain data on aspects like reliability, which is seldom mentioned in just-released-product reviews in the "slick" magazines. For example, years ago I bought a Pioneer TX-9100 tuner based on a review which discussed using it for mobile FM DXing while travelling cross-country by car (with an inverter power supply). It got much abuse but still worked well. Based on that info, I picked one up when they were being closed-out at discount from a local hi-fi emporium and was well pleased with it thereafter. Now, seeing some references in the audio press to this tuner, I find I have a "classic"! So I place some faith in this sort of equipment review, whether it is positive or negative. Since there is no advertising (or payment!), there can be no pressure on the reviewer. Hope this info is of interest... Regards, ARPA/MILNET: wmartin@almsa-1.ARPA USENET: seismo!brl-bmd!wmartin