Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!brl-tgr!ron From: ron@brl-tgr.ARPA (Ron Natalie ) Newsgroups: net.med,net.kids Subject: Re: Allergies Message-ID: <10623@brl-tgr.ARPA> Date: Mon, 13-May-85 14:53:40 EDT Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.10623 Posted: Mon May 13 14:53:40 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 16-May-85 02:49:06 EDT References: <1668@bmcg.UUCP> Organization: Ballistic Research Lab Lines: 48 Xref: linus net.med:1339 net.kids:1200 After living for years suffering almost continuously from allergic problems as a kid, I made the first trip to the allergist in about 7th grade. I am allergic to Trees, Grass, Mold, Dust, and Ragweed. Trees are my big killer are marginal (mowing the lawn bothered me but it wasn't that uncomfortable). I continued the shots about once every three weeks after the initial work-up and weekly during the time that trees and grasses were pollenating. Prices were about $5. an injection at the time. I discontinued the treatment when I went off to college. > > Fundamental Questions: > > 1. Is anyone familiar with an example of an allergic person who has > used hyposensitization therapy and has actually improved? Do you > know anyone who has been told (by their allergist) "Well, I guess > we can stop with the injections now"? Does this ever happen? I suppose I may be a little better off, although I don't spend as much time outdoors as I used to. I still get mild problems during the right seasons, but nothing that makes me want to go back to the injections again. I don't get the miserable, runny eyes allergic problems I used to. > 2. Is the long-term usage of antihistamine preparations known to be > free of unwanted side-effects or is there some nastiness here I > should be aware of? I've not found a whole lot of antihistimines that I can live with taking. Actifed and Chlortrinitron zonk me out dead. The prescription Naldecon is better, but still not great. I use Sudafed when I have too, it's a pretty good dryer upper, and doesn't incapacitate me too badly. > 3. Have the methods of allergy testing advanced any? What is the > current state of the science? My testing took about three > weeks, involved some 180 varied Witches' brews and philters which > were injected subcutaneously into my inner forearm, 10 to 20 at a > time. I had the pock marked back treatment for the initial testing. After they had it narrowed down they did the same thing to my arm (since it was only a dozen or so). Someone mentioned that they have some new testing method that they use to do the initial testing that narrows it down for the traditional tests. -Ron