Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 GARFIELD 20/11/84; site garfield.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcsri!garfield!steven
From: steven@garfield.UUCP (Steven D. Brown)
Newsgroups: net.micro
Subject: Re: Re: Re: MAIL ORDERS  (Priority-1)
Message-ID: <2914@garfield.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 15-May-85 18:35:18 EDT
Article-I.D.: garfield.2914
Posted: Wed May 15 18:35:18 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 15-May-85 22:21:29 EDT
References: <10307@brl-tgr.ARPA> <2201@usceast.UUCP> <569@intelca.UUCP> <1775@watcgl.UUCP>
Organization: Memorial U. of Nfld. C.S. Dept., St. John's
Lines: 28

> 
>  Personally I have also had good experiences with California 
>  Digital (although they use expensive shipping - at least to
>  Canada - ) and Competitive Edge (was Sluder).  My dealings
>  with Seattle Computer and S100 Inc. have been generally good
>  as well.
> 
>  Perhaps it would be a useful thing if a list were to be
>  compiled rating mail order houses.  Networks like this
>  are probably one of the only places people can find out
>  about mail order outfits (as opposed to being able to
>  talk to other customers of a physically local outfit).
>  It seems like a list would be a public service?
> 
>  I have no affiliation with any of the above except as a
>  satisfied customer.
>  
>  John Chapman
> ...!watmath!watcgl!jchapman

*** REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR MESSAGE ***

I whole heartily agree with this people mention only the names of
companies which give good service. How about providing addresses so
we out here in the boonies can try our luck?

steve 
"The Goofy Newfie"