Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!brl-tgr!tgr!KSPROUL@RUTGERS.ARPA
From: KSPROUL@RUTGERS.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.micro
Subject: Re: More fuel for the anti-Intel flames
Message-ID: <10611@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Date: Mon, 13-May-85 07:24:50 EDT
Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.10611
Posted: Mon May 13 07:24:50 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 16-May-85 03:19:58 EDT
Sender: news@brl-tgr.ARPA
Lines: 16


> Besides, since most 68000 and 32000 supporters don't intend to program
> in assembler language anyway, why should they *care* what the internal
> architecture is, as long as the system performs well?

I am an AVID 68000 supporter, in fact I have 3 different 68000 at home,
A Macintosh, a DTACK grounded 68000 board for an Apple, and an MTU computer
which is an obscure computer from a small company in North Carolina..

I program these things almost exclusively in assembler and LOVE the 68000..
And I have done an extensive amount of assembler programing both on the
68K and other processors (most of the rest 8-bit though)...

Keith Sproul
Ksproul@Rutgers.arpa
-------