Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site watcgl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!watnot!watcgl!jchapman
From: jchapman@watcgl.UUCP (john chapman)
Newsgroups: net.micro
Subject: Re: Re: Re: MAIL ORDERS  (Priority-1)
Message-ID: <1850@watcgl.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 16-May-85 13:05:48 EDT
Article-I.D.: watcgl.1850
Posted: Thu May 16 13:05:48 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 16-May-85 23:50:16 EDT
References: <10307@brl-tgr.ARPA> <2201@usceast.UUCP> <569@intelca.UUCP> <1775@watcgl.UUCP> <2914@garfield.UUCP>
Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 30

> > 
> >  Personally I have also had good experiences with California 
> >  Digital (although they use expensive shipping - at least to
> >  Canada - ) and Competitive Edge (was Sluder).  My dealings
> >  with Seattle Computer and S100 Inc. have been generally good
> >  as well.
> > 
> >  Perhaps it would be a useful thing if a list were to be
> >  compiled rating mail order houses.  Networks like this
> >  are probably one of the only places people can find out
> >  about mail order outfits (as opposed to being able to
> >  talk to other customers of a physically local outfit).
> >  It seems like a list would be a public service?
> > 
.
.
> 
> I whole heartily agree with this people mention only the names of
> companies which give good service. How about providing addresses so
> we out here in the boonies can try our luck?
> 
> steve 
> "The Goofy Newfie"
 
 If people would like to mail me the names and addresses of mail
 order companies and some kind of rating (1-10? 1=bad 10=good)
 I will be happy to summarize and post to the net.
 
 John Chapman
..!watmath!watcgl!jchapman