Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 4/15/85; site seismo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!stev
From: stev@seismo.UUCP (Stev Knowles)
Newsgroups: net.micro.att
Subject: XENIX 3.0
Message-ID: <2343@seismo.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 20-May-85 00:34:52 EDT
Article-I.D.: seismo.2343
Posted: Mon May 20 00:34:52 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 21-May-85 01:36:01 EDT
Distribution: na
Organization: Center for Seismic Studies, Arlington, VA
Lines: 24

i have noticed in the local paper (the washington post(*)) business section,
large (full page) ads for the pc 6300+, which includes everything a man
could want at a new low price until june 1st. fine. it also mentions
the XENIX 3.0(*) from att that it will run. getting better. call the 800
number. 'who has gotten this XENIX operating system from att?'
' why sir, every one of the stores listed in the ad stock the XENIX operating
system'. great. call one, 'never heard of it sir.' called another,'
what ad?' called a third ' we are discussing our obligation concerning
the add with our att reps now.' called . . . . . called everyone listed in the
metro washington area. nothing. i thought about sending this to net.micro.pc,
but hey, isnt this a better place for this?(dont answer that). have any of you
*seen* this beast? i dont mean the XENIX that runs on the itty bitty machine's
/at, but the one advertised to run on the att 6300 (and compatibles, i assume).
there, now isnt that simple? right.
if you would send your answers to me, i would try to summarize, but you proballywont, and thats alright (sigh). if you could send me the nameand number of
someone in att marketing who would be of help, i would appreciate it, though.


thanks.
stev
	stev@seismo(hey, everyone knows where seismo is, dont they?)

* XENIX is a trademark, possibly of att,
* the washington post, thought, is NOT a trademark of att.