Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site petrus.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!petrus!dan From: dan@petrus.UUCP Newsgroups: net.misc Subject: Re: telephone bill bug Message-ID: <342@petrus.UUCP> Date: Thu, 9-May-85 19:56:32 EDT Article-I.D.: petrus.342 Posted: Thu May 9 19:56:32 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 10-May-85 02:27:13 EDT References: <386@sii.UUCP> Organization: Bell Communications Research, Inc Lines: 35 > Howdy > > Recently, I received an AT&T bill that had the following sort of > entries in it: > > No. -Date- -Time- --Number-- Code -Min- -Amount- > 10. Mar 12 1159PM 617 xxx-xxxx ND 1 .18 > 11. Mar 13 1200AM 617 yyy-yyyy NDM > CONVERSATION MINUTES 1443 253.10 > 12. Mar 13 1210AM 616 zzz-zzzz ND 6 .70 > > Notice that #11, which occured between 12:00 and 12:10 on the same > day, lasted for 1443 minutes, which is about 1440 minutes (24 hours) > longer than the actual time spent (I'm glad i had an extra call > at 12:10, otherwise i couldn't prove it!). I wonder whether some > statistics-gathering program is reading more than one changable > register (i.e., date and time) without ensuring that the values are > consistent. I thought that somebody out there might find this > amusing, maybe even relevant. > > mm This is not a bug. We are doing research in the area of "income enhancement". The theory is that some customers will pay an overcharge rather than dispute it. The object of this experiment was an empirical derivation of the functional relationship between magnitude of overcharge and probability of payment without complaint. Thanks for the feedback. We originally thought that netnews readers would be less likely to notice large telephone bills. I guess we were wrong. P.S. Are you over 25? Did you attend a private school? Do you make over $30,000 a year? Do you beat your wife? What is your social security number?