Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site umd5.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!decuac!cvl!umd5!zben
From: zben@umd5.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.misc
Subject: Re: How "coke" will back out...
Message-ID: <518@umd5.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 15-May-85 19:58:33 EDT
Article-I.D.: umd5.518
Posted: Wed May 15 19:58:33 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 17-May-85 03:06:27 EDT
References: <657@vortex.UUCP>
Reply-To: zben@umd5.UUCP (Ben Cranston)
Organization: U of Md, CSC, College Park, Md
Lines: 22
Summary: Ugly rumors

Good, because I'm drinking Pepsi until it happens.  As are all my friends.

Has anybody else compared the list of ingredients on the old and new cans?
The ones I looked at, the second ingredient on the old cans is:

     Sugar

and the second ingredient on the new cans is:

     High Fructose Corn Syrup and/or Sugar

or something close to it.  Now, maybe this should go to net.rumor or maybe
even net.politics, but there is an interesting correlation between the
sudden (and evidently unplanned for) change in formula, the sanctions we are
putting on the Nicaraguans (note sugar is their second biggest export, after
coffee), and the fact that the Contra's politial leader is the former manager
of the Coca Cola plant in Managua...

I may have voted for the man, but he's messing around with my Coca Cola!
I mean, is *NOTHING* sacred?
-- 
Ben Cranston  ...{seismo!umcp-cs,ihnp4!rlgvax}!cvl!umd5!zben  zben@umd2.ARPA