Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: $Revision: 1.6.2.16 $; site amdcad.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!amdcad!phil
From: phil@amdcad.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.news
Subject: Re: Orphaned Response
Message-ID: <-118600@amdcad.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 28-Apr-85 17:21:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: amdcad.-118600
Posted: Sun Apr 28 17:21:00 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 16-May-85 22:09:26 EDT
References: <154@gloria.UUCP>
Lines: 23
Nf-ID: #R:gloria:-15400:amdcad:-118600:177600:943
Nf-From: amdcad!phil    Apr 28 17:21:00 1985


In article <154@gloria.UUCP>, colonel@gloria.UUCP writes:
> The Net is the arsenal of anarchy.  Nobody has any business going outside
> the Net for redress.  In fact, all news recipients ought to be required
> to agree not to prosecute one another for netlibel.
> 
> Legally, you're in the clear.  How could it be proved who you are or
> that you and not somebody else posted the article?
> -- 
> Col. G. L. Sicherman
> ...{rocksvax|decvax}!sunybcs!colonel

Just as a point of information, our policy is that we will not say anything
bad about vendors, competitors, or customers on this network. (although
sometimes new users slip up) We'd prefer to work it out with them rather
than getting outsiders involved. I happen to think this is a wise policy
but am not trying to force this on others.
-- 
 I speak for myself and no one else.

 Phil Ngai (408) 749-5720
 UUCP: {ucbvax,decwrl,ihnp4,allegra}!amdcad!phil
 ARPA: amdcad!phil@decwrl.ARPA