Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site cadovax.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!talcott!panda!genrad!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!trwrb!trwrba!cadovax!keithd From: keithd@cadovax.UUCP (Keith Doyle) Newsgroups: net.origins Subject: Re: The Scientific Case for Creation: (Part 14) Message-ID: <615@cadovax.UUCP> Date: Mon, 13-May-85 21:15:54 EDT Article-I.D.: cadovax.615 Posted: Mon May 13 21:15:54 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 16-May-85 07:49:29 EDT References: <352@iham1.UUCP> Organization: Contel Cado, Torrance, CA Lines: 34 > THE SCIENTIFIC CASE FOR CREATION: 116 CATEGORIES OF EVIDENCE This would seem to be a creationist effort to win the debate by filibuster, i.e. the one who talks the longest wins. > C. NEW RESEARCH SHOWS THAT THE REQUIREMENTS FOR LIFE ARE SO > COMPLEX THAT CHANCE AND EVEN BILLIONS OF YEARS CANNOT EXPLAIN > IT. I'll believe it when I see it. > 26. There have been many imaginative but unsuccessful attempts > to explain how just one single protein could form from any > of the assumed atmospheres of the early earth. The > chemistry of the earth's rocks indicates that these > atmospheres never existed [a-c]. Furthermore, the > necessary chemical reactions all tend to move in the > opposite direction from that required by evolution [d]. > Each possible energy source, whether the earth's heat, > electrical discharges, or the sun's radiation, would have > destroyed the protein products tens of thousands of times > faster than they could be formed [e-g]. Ancient Precambrian rocks are rich in unoxidized iron compounds that could not have been formed in the presence of oxygen. See: P.E. Cloud, "Cosmos, Earth, and Man" (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1978), also "Scientific American" September 1978. Again, let us note that evolution does not necessarily encompass how the whole process started, just the fact that it is going on. Keith Doyle # {ucbvax,ihnp4,decvax}!trwrb!cadovax!keithd