Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site utastro.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!intelca!qantel!dual!mordor!ut-sally!utastro!padraig
From: padraig@utastro.UUCP (Padraig Houlahan)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: Don't get mad, now...
Message-ID: <100@utastro.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 16-May-85 15:29:41 EDT
Article-I.D.: utastro.100
Posted: Thu May 16 15:29:41 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 19-May-85 00:03:27 EDT
References: <1090@uwmacc.UUCP>
Organization: U. Texas, Astronomy, Austin, TX
Lines: 18

> 
> > [Steve Wall]
> > Creation doesn't have to be science to be true.  There are some things which
> > science can't explain.  Personally, I find evolution harder to believe than
> > creation, just because of the problems accociated with it.
> 
> The burning question in this newsgroup is whether it *is* science, not
> whether it is religion.
> 
> -- 
>                                                                     |
> Paul DuBois     {allegra,ihnp4,seismo}!uwvax!uwmacc!dubois        --+--

 If this is the case Paul, why do you spend so much time splitting
evolutionary hairs instead of offering us proof of the scientific nature
that creationism is supposed to have?

Padraig Houlahan.