Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version nyu B notes v1.5 12/10/84; site csd2.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!csd2!dimitrov
From: dimitrov@csd2.UUCP (Isaac Dimitrovsky)
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: news item
Message-ID: <3630006@csd2.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 9-May-85 11:20:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: csd2.3630006
Posted: Thu May  9 11:20:00 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 11-May-85 08:18:18 EDT
References: <3630005@csd2.UUCP>
Organization: New York University
Lines: 20

[]

>
>If coercion is used to get an employer to hire someone, and the ostensible
>reason for the use of force is that the employer is unwilling to hire
>that person because of his/her membership in some group (organized or
>unorganized) of people, then you and all others in that group are members of
>a "protected class."

What if the *real* reason for the use of force is that the employer is
unwilling to hire that person, etc. ?

By the way, I don't see how force is being used except in an economic sense.

Now, if a private company wants to discriminate against a group, I guess
that's their business, just as it could then be the business of the group
to raise hell about it and thus damage the companies business in return.
But I don't think the government has any business with such companies.

Isaac Dimitrovsky