Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 4/15/85; site ubvax.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!prls!amdimage!amdcad!cae780!ubvax!tonyw From: tonyw@ubvax.UUCP (Tony Wuersch) Newsgroups: net.politics Subject: Re: Strangling Nicaragua Message-ID: <174@ubvax.UUCP> Date: Wed, 8-May-85 14:41:09 EDT Article-I.D.: ubvax.174 Posted: Wed May 8 14:41:09 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 12-May-85 11:10:29 EDT References: <576@cadovax.UUCP> <164@ttrdc.UUCP>, <1021@uwmacc.UUCP> <173@ttrdc.UUCP> Organization: Ungermann-Bass, Inc., Santa Clara, CA Lines: 32 Re La Prensa in Managua, I've recently had the opportunity to give advice to a friend who was writing to the Nation in response to some articles about suppression of human rights in Nicaragua. The points I made to him apply here too: 1. Moralities and protections of human rights can differ from normal, peaceful times in times of war. 2. Two areas they can differ in is in draft mobilizations and protection of absolute press freedoms (I don't accept, on the other hand, preventive detentions, for instance). 3. Our worries about suppressions of press freedoms, etc., would be justified if those suppressions were not REVOCABLE. I think that's a general principle, that those weakenings of human rights protections applied in warfare must be revocable when the war has ended. 4. Hence, if Nicaragua is at war, than we should properly defend the right of La Prensa to continue to publish and not be shut down, but we can't reasonably complain if the Sandinistas decide to apply censorship during wartime. The Israeli government does no less, and it isn't even in a state of war. I believe Nicaragua is at war against the contras and their CIA/Somozista supporters. The evidence of invasion and death is everywhere within the country. Hence I question the political motives of those who continually harp on La Prensa censorship. Let's wait until the war is over before we apply harsh judgments, please. Tony Wuersch {amd,amdcad}!cae780!ubvax!tonyw