Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site oakhill.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!ut-sally!oakhill!davet From: davet@oakhill.UUCP (Dave Trissel) Newsgroups: net.religion,net.religion.jewish,net.religion.christian Subject: Re: Bravo Silbermann! Message-ID: <411@oakhill.UUCP> Date: Tue, 7-May-85 14:53:46 EDT Article-I.D.: oakhill.411 Posted: Tue May 7 14:53:46 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 10-May-85 01:53:59 EDT References: Reply-To: davet@oakhill.UUCP (Dave Trissel) Distribution: net Organization: Motorola Inc. Austin, Tx Lines: 24 Xref: watmath net.religion:6857 net.religion.jewish:1941 net.religion.christian:711 In article <161@ucdavis.UUCP> ccrdave@ucdavis.UUCP (Lord Kahless) writes: > >And while we're on the subject of wrong, Rosen should know better >than to try to equate homosexuality and freedom of religion. > 1) Homosexuality isn't a religion, it's a sexual preference > some people choose to live. And while we're on the subject of wrong, I find it interesting that you state that heterosexuality isn't a religion, it's a sexual preference some people choose to live. I think it would be really interesting to find out when you chose to be heterosexual and why you did so. Maybe if your reasoning is sound you can help other people just now chosing their sexuality to come over to you side. We all eagerly await your reasons. And while your at it, why don't you tell us why you chose the race your a member of. I presume you chose a lighter shade since, well, we know that's by far the largest in this country and there are many negative -you know- attributes associate with the darker ones. Certainly that would be enough reason to chose a lighter shade, wouldn't it? Well? We're waiting. Dave Trissel {siesmo,gatech,ihnp4}!ut-sally!oakhill!davet