Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ccice5.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!rochester!ritcv!ccice5!rdz
From: rdz@ccice5.UUCP (Robert D. Zarcone)
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: Re: liquor laws
Message-ID: <831@ccice5.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 15-May-85 12:14:29 EDT
Article-I.D.: ccice5.831
Posted: Wed May 15 12:14:29 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 16-May-85 21:58:22 EDT
References: <434@cvl.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: CCI Central Engineering, Rochester, NY
Lines: 20

> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 	I rarely drink, so as far as I'm concerned they can
> ban liquor (and automobile) sales six days of the week, and 
> perhaps we wouldn't have so many deaths and injuries because
> of drunk drivers, especially on weekends when people are on
> the road.
> 	Would you like to support a law to ban liquor sales
> six days a week? I can see plenty in favor of this, which has
> nothing to do with religion.
> 
> 				David Harwood

I'm surprised that you take such a narrow view, considering the rest of your
article so accurately showed the purpose of seperation is to guarentee, in
part, tolerance of others.  As for your question, my answer is no.  This
country has already tried "The Grand Experiment" and found that it didn't
work.  I drink.  When I do it to excess, I don't drive.  This doesn't
intrude into your life.  Please don't intrude into mine.

	*** REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR MESSAGE ***