Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site unc.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!unc!fsks From: fsks@unc.UUCP (Frank Silbermann) Newsgroups: net.religion,net.religion.jewish,net.religion.christian Subject: Re: The Old Ways - final comments Message-ID: <256@unc.UUCP> Date: Sun, 19-May-85 17:39:18 EDT Article-I.D.: unc.256 Posted: Sun May 19 17:39:18 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 20-May-85 04:42:56 EDT References: <715@decwrl.UUCP> <587@pyuxd.UUCP> <150@unc.UUCP> <168@unc.UUCP> Reply-To: fsks@unc.UUCP (Frank Silbermann) Organization: CS Dept., U. of N. Carolina at Chapel Hill Lines: 34 Xref: watmath net.religion:6927 net.religion.jewish:1988 net.religion.christian:731 Summary: In article rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Arthur Pewtey) writes: > >> I have nothing against your pointing out inconsistencies within Christianity. >> That is your right. But do it from within a Christian perspective >> or do it in another newsgroup. Leave net.christian for the Christians. >We've been through this before. A public forum is a public forum. It doesn't >"belong" to anyone or any group. There is a private mailing list in existence >which is a private forum. I post general topics to net.religion, otherwise >I post to specific group(s) (and possibly the general group as well). Nonsense. We must obey certain conventions to keep the network feasible. One of the conventions is keeping our postings in the appropriate newsgroups. For instance, if I want to find a long-lost friend, I might wish to post to net.general, to ensure that EVERYBODY sees my posting. But that would be a net-etiquette violation. Such postings must go to net.people, EVEN THOUGH SOME PEOPLE I MIGHT WISH TO READ MY POSTING DON'T SUBSCRIBE. I must respect the right of people to choose not to see what I want them to read. In specific, net.religion.christian is for Christians to discuss Christianity and their religious experiences. Non-Christians like me may use this group to request information, or to participate (if they can do so) from a Christian point of view. Analogously for net.religion.jewish. Discussions about whether Christianity is a good idea in the first place is a (higher level) meta-discussion, which belongs in a meta-newsgroup. We have such a newgroup. It is called net.religion. This is the group for inter-religion debates. This is where your anti-Bible postings belong. Please respect the net-etiquette. Too many people disreguarding the the newsgroup definitions will drive the net to moderated newsgroups. Frank Silbermann