Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site orca.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!orca!davidl From: davidl@orca.UUCP (David Levine) Newsgroups: net.rumor,net.nlang Subject: Re: We're really all Veccuppians... Message-ID: <1513@orca.UUCP> Date: Mon, 20-May-85 13:42:11 EDT Article-I.D.: orca.1513 Posted: Mon May 20 13:42:11 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 22-May-85 02:05:19 EDT References: <748@ssc-vax.UUCP> <32900001@siemens.UUCP> Reply-To: davidl@orca.UUCP (David Levine) Organization: Tektronix, Wilsonville OR Lines: 28 Xref: watmath net.rumor:814 net.nlang:3097 In article <32900001@siemens.UUCP> rick@siemens.UUCP writes: > ...we may call people from the U.S.S.R. Russians but they are more >properly addressed as Soviets. (Just as people from the Irish Republic are >Irish). Sorry. A "soviet" is a legislative body. It makes no more sense to call a citizen of the Soviet Union a "Soviet" than it does to call a citizen of the United States a "Congress." Evidence for my claim: The American Heritage Dictionary defines "soviet" (n) as a legislative assembly. It then defines "Soviet" (adj) as "of or pertaining to the USSR", while "soviet" (adj) is "of or pertaining to a soviet." On the other hand, "American" (adj) means "of or pertaining to" several parts of the Western Hemisphere (as described in a previous posting), and "American" (n) is 1) an inhabitant of America or 2) a citizen of the US. I think that one calls a citizen of the Soviet Union a "Soviet citizen." Or perhaps "Comrade." :-) David D. Levine (...decvax!tektronix!orca!davidl) [UUCP] (orca!davidl.tektronix@csnet-relay.csnet) [ARPA] P.S. I'm cross-posting to net.rumor and net.nlang. This debate began with a discussion as to whether or not Canadians are Americans, and has gone quite beyond the scope of net.rumor. I therefore propose that the discussion be moved to net.nlang (which I don't read. Ha!). - DL whether