Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site utastro.UUCP Path: utzoo!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!ut-sally!utastro!ethan From: ethan@utastro.UUCP (Ethan Vishniac) Newsgroups: net.motss,net.sci Subject: Re: Data: Homosexuality may not be learned (or inherited, or...) Message-ID: <87@utastro.UUCP> Date: Mon, 13-May-85 14:54:24 EDT Article-I.D.: utastro.87 Posted: Mon May 13 14:54:24 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 15-May-85 01:38:47 EDT References: <1486@aecom.UUCP> <618@ptsfa.UUCP> <368@bbnccv.UUCP> <1499@amdahl.UUCP> <4186@hlexa.UUCP> <1511@amdahl.UUCP> Distribution: na Organization: U. Texas, Astronomy, Austin, TX Lines: 28 > > > > Why is it so obvious that homosexuality isn't inherited? It could be > > inherited as a recessive trait or a predisposition, or some combination, > > or am I wrong? > > You are right that some homosexuals do have children, and that if > it were inheritable homosexuality could be a recessive trait. But > that would mean that the children of homosexuals would have a > higher incidence of homosexuality that the population at large. > (I have no data there). If there were a gene responsible, it > would be eventually driven out because of the relatively few number of > homosexuals who reproduce. All that this requires is that the gene for homosexuality (if such a thing were to exist) would be spontaneously created through mutation at a sufficient level to produce a stable fraction of the population who were homosexual. Alternatively, it might be that having some fraction of homosexuals in the tribe confers a benefit on the tribe. Then tribes with a recessive gene for homosexuality could successfully compete with tribes with purely heterosexual populations. The above is not intended as judgement on the plausibility of genes that fix one's sexual orientation. "Don't argue with a fool. Ethan Vishniac Borrow his money." {charm,ut-sally,ut-ngp,noao}!utastro!ethan Department of Astronomy University of Texas