Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site ihlpg.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!mtuxo!drutx!ihnp4!ihlpg!sed408
From: sed408@ihlpg.UUCP (s. dugan)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: Dancing
Message-ID: <477@ihlpg.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 13-May-85 14:13:28 EDT
Article-I.D.: ihlpg.477
Posted: Mon May 13 14:13:28 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 14-May-85 20:30:20 EDT
References: <141@unc.UUCP> <1228@houxm.UUCP> <92@parallel.uucp>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 18

> If it isn't written by Strauss (or any of his contemporaries), it
> isn't worth dancing to.
> 
> 			(-: How's that for a blanket statement :-)
> 			eric

Right on!  I tired of the rock-n-roll dancing VERY quickly.  It's VERY boring
after a while.  Half the time the music is so loud that you can't hear a
thing.  I have some semi-serious hearing loss and I find loud music physically
painful.  Also, when I'm with a date, I like close dancing.  This usually
means either ballroom dancing (which I LOVE) or folk/square dancing (which I
also really enjoy).  After all, dancing "cheek-to-cheek" is just a vertical
expression of a horozontal desire.  Think about it.  It really is incredibly
sensuous!  (Almost as good as foreplay.  Shall we say foreforeplay?  Or maybe
foresquarplay?)

                                        Sarah E. Dugan
																				(no clever lines)