Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84; site mhuxl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!bellcore!sabre!zeta!epsilon!gamma!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!mhuxm!mhuxi!mhuxl!ogre
From: ogre@mhuxl.UUCP (LO COCO)
Newsgroups: net.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: Artificial vs Grass (The definitive answer!)
Message-ID: <210@mhuxl.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 17-May-85 07:39:06 EDT
Article-I.D.: mhuxl.210
Posted: Fri May 17 07:39:06 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 17-May-85 16:03:33 EDT
References: <2726@drutx.UUCP> <5758@umcp-cs.UUCP>
Distribution: na
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill
Lines: 28

> >I wouldn't jump all over the NL.  The NL is split with 6 grass and
> >6 artificial.  

	True! Grass: NY,Chi,Atl,LA,SF,& SD.
	      A.Turf: Pit,Phi,Mon,StL,Cin,& Hou(The original)

> >...The AL is 8 grass and 6 artificial.  

	False! Grass: NY,Bos,Det,Bal,Cle,Mil,Chi,Cal,Oak,& Tex.
	       A.Turf: Tor,KC,Min*,& Sea*. 

> Hmmm, that is more than I thought, and the more I think about it, the
> more I am starting to doubt it. I can only think of 
> Kansas City, Toronto, and the (domed stadiums*) (ugghh!) in Minnesota
> and Seattle. I may be wrong, but it seems to me that the rest are 
> natural turf fields. Which netter out there can provide the definitive answer?

	Reference: The World Almanac (1985 edition).
	Now we can let the subject rest except for eliminating this
	'abomination' of the sport!

	GO YANKEES!
-- 

				John B. Lo Coco
				(...mhuxl!ogre)
				(...szuxn!ogre)
				1-201-467-7436