Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ucla-cs.ARPA Path: utzoo!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!trwrb!cepu!ucla-cs!lor From: lor@ucla-cs.UUCP Newsgroups: net.sport.hockey Subject: Re: Here Come the Finals Message-ID: <5484@ucla-cs.ARPA> Date: Fri, 17-May-85 01:43:34 EDT Article-I.D.: ucla-cs.5484 Posted: Fri May 17 01:43:34 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 21-May-85 01:41:16 EDT References: <5482@ucla-cs.ARPA> Reply-To: lor@ucla-cs.UUCP (Kar-Wing Lor) Distribution: na Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Lines: 55 Summary: > Well, contrary to all my expectations the Oilers and the Flyers will play > in the Stanley Cup Finals. Your EXPECTATIONS? The predictions you've made about this year's playoffs are all wishful thinkings. An Islanders vs Hawks Final? Better wait till next century. I wished the Caps would be the champs, but given a little logic, I knew the Flyers would be the team to win the Wales Conference. > Given the injuries to the Flyers the Oilers > should win handily, but then they should have beaten Chicago handily. They should have. However, nobody expects that 11-2 blowout in the first game, which inspired Chicago to extend the series to 6 games. The rout, which changed the complexion of the series, was really a surprise. > No matter, the Oilers have an awesome offensive team (that never stops, > but then we have beaten that horse to death :-) ) and will probably set > all kinds of records on the way to a 2nd consecutive (and last) Cup. Your major problem as a hockey fan is you are still living in 1983. Granted, the Oilers had a flashy but not tough-enough offense, or even immature teams in 1982 and 1983. That's why they busted in the playoffs, buried by the islanders in 4 straight. But this is 1985. An immature offense a couple years ago does not mean an immature offense now. On the other hand, a team that won 4 Cups years ago does not mean it can win a cup today. This is cruel but true - it isn't 1983 anymore. I have the same problem as I, a diehard Redskins fan, am still wishing they are the team of 83, which won the Super Bowl. > I say last because they can't continue to meet teams with as massive > injuries, can they? Well, you should have known a team ALWAYS needs luck to win championships. The most important favor from Lady Luck is to stay healthy. If your team is crippled, there is nobody to blame but her. Don't you think Montreal was lucky in 1976-79 because they had Dryden, Gainey, Lafleur, and Robinson healthy? Didn't the Isles get the smile from Lady Luck because Smith, Potvin, Bossy, and Trottier were available during 1980-83 playoffs? True, the Oilers are extremely lucky because they had no serious injuries to their key players in the 84 and 85 playoffs. But if that's the decision from heaven, there is nothing you can complain about. Tough luck to the Flyers! -- A diehard Capital fan and a diehard Islander hater! -- Eddy Lor ...!(ihnp4,ucbvax)!ucla-cs!lor lor@ucla-locus.arpa