Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site rayssd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!rayssd!m1b
From: m1b@rayssd.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.startrek
Subject: Re: inconsistencies
Message-ID: <743@rayssd.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 16-May-85 12:39:31 EDT
Article-I.D.: rayssd.743
Posted: Thu May 16 12:39:31 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 18-May-85 01:08:14 EDT
Distribution: net
Organization: Raytheon Co., Portsmouth RI
Lines: 21

In <502@hoxna.UUCP> Ken Kepple writes:

> First of all, I don't recall an explanation of the artificial gravity
> that the Enterprise apparently generates. I guess this also applies to
> the shuttle craft as well. You never see equipment or crew floating
> around.

	I don't know what the technology involved is but you have
to really applaud the contruction of those generators.  No matter
how badly damaged a Federation ship is (Reliant missing an engine,
its bridge a shambles), those suckers are still kicking!

	Imagine if they weren't made so well.  The Enterprise trashes
the Reliant, the gravity generators cease operation, Khan and the
Genesis 'bomb' float apart, Khan dies before he can reach and activate
it and give his nice soliloquy....

	Would of, could of, should of...

Joe Barone,	{allegra, decvax!brunix, linus, ccice5}!rayssd!m1b
Raytheon Co,	Submarine Signal Div., Box 330, Portsmouth, RI  02871