Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 SMI; site sun.uucp Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!talcott!panda!genrad!decvax!decwrl!sun!guy From: guy@sun.uucp (Guy Harris) Newsgroups: net.unix Subject: Re: Workstations - how are they used? Message-ID: <2167@sun.uucp> Date: Thu, 9-May-85 04:03:50 EDT Article-I.D.: sun.2167 Posted: Thu May 9 04:03:50 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 11-May-85 09:11:45 EDT References: <10478@brl-tgr.ARPA> Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc. Lines: 26 > How do people apply high-powered work stations in software development? ... > or if there were some sort of windowing facility a la blit, I could see how > it might be a win. But in general, the technology that the Iris, a Sun, or > any of the other graphics workstations offer seems to be very expensive for > what it adds to the general-purpose UNIX user. Well, the Sun *does* have "some sort of windowing facility a la BLIT". *I* certainly find it comes in handy, and the company I work for provides one to all its programmers and documenters, so it obviously must consider it worth providing its programmers with Sun workstations :-). There's a fancy front-end to "dbx" called "dbxtool" running here, which from the description looks very nice (one could, presumably, make some sort of screen-oriented front end for a timeshared mini + CRT terminal, but the ability to run the debugger and the debugee in a separate window makes it a lot nicer); I haven't used it (having barely started using "dbx" - I used "sdb" prior to that for reasons you really don't want to know) so I can't say much more about it. Yes, it's expensive (although it'll get less so with advancing chip technology). It'll get more cost-effective as more powerful development tools are produced which make use of the single-user CPU and bit-mapped display/mouse. People probably considered cursor-addressible CRT terminals running at 9600 baud expensive for the general-purpose user at one point in the past. Guy Harris