Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site rtech.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!zehntel!dual!unisoft!mtxinu!rtech!wong
From: wong@rtech.ARPA (J. Wong)
Newsgroups: net.unix,net.legal
Subject: Re: International System V, crypt etc.
Message-ID: <379@rtech.ARPA>
Date: Sat, 11-May-85 21:52:33 EDT
Article-I.D.: rtech.379
Posted: Sat May 11 21:52:33 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 14-May-85 23:48:15 EDT
References: <392@bbnccv.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: Relational Technology, Berkeley CA
Lines: 20
Xref: watmath net.unix:4503 net.legal:1691

> 
> Does the prohibition on the distribution of crypt() apply only to
> sources ...


So, what would happen if netters, in an effort to screw up the NSA,
decide to post 'crypt()' source to the net, which just happens to
get sent to Europe?  Are there any legal penalties?  Is your company
liable?

(It sounds like a better way to upset the NSA than putting keywords
in articles :-).)
-- 
				J. Wong		ucbvax!mtxinu!rtech!wong

****************************************************************
You start a conversation, you can't even finish it.
You're talking alot, but you're not saying anything.
When I have nothing to say, my lips are sealed.
Say something once, why say it again.		- David Byrne