Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site topaz.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!cbdkc1!desoto!packard!topaz!SASW@MIT-MC From: SASW@MIT-MC Newsgroups: net.works Subject: [WALLACE.DCHENG: Use of micros in universities [request for information]] Message-ID: <1978@topaz.ARPA> Date: Tue, 14-May-85 00:43:11 EDT Article-I.D.: topaz.1978 Posted: Tue May 14 00:43:11 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 15-May-85 00:31:20 EDT Sender: daemon@topaz.ARPA Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J. Lines: 28 From: Steven A. Swernofsky MSG: *MSG 4090 Date: 05/13/85 19:10:15 From: WALLACE.DCHENG at MIT-XX Re: Use of micros in universities [request for information] Received: from MIT-XX.ARPA by MIT-MC.ARPA; 13 May 85 19:00:33 EST Date: Mon 13 May 85 18:46:52-EDT From: Daniel C. Cheng Subject: Use of micros in universities [request for information] To: arpanet-bboards@MIT-MC.ARPA ReSent-date: 13 May 1985 19:10:16 EDT ReSent-from: Arpanet-BBoards-Request at MIT-MC I am collecting information about the growing use of microcomputers at the university level for course use. Specifically, how do students in non-technical courses (e.g. business, medicine, law, humanities ...) react to the integration of micros into their curriculum? Moreover, what are the attitudes of university officials? Are they just making computing power available to those who desire it, or are they reshaping the actual courses to take full advantage of the technology available? If you have any information or pointers to people I should talk to, please send mail (WALLACE.DCHENG at MIT-XX) or call (617)863-5100. Thanks in advance. (I will send a summary of my findings to anyone who requests it). Dan.