Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site reed.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!hao!hplabs!tektronix!reed!rosalia
From: rosalia@reed.UUCP (Mark Galassi)
Newsgroups: net.arch,net.unix
Subject: Re: AT&T 3B-2's
Message-ID: <1588@reed.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 1-Jun-85 02:57:48 EDT
Article-I.D.: reed.1588
Posted: Sat Jun  1 02:57:48 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 2-Jun-85 20:37:57 EDT
References: <843@sdcsvax.UUCP>
Reply-To: rosalia@reed.UUCP (Mark Galassi)
Organization: Reed College, Portland, Oregon
Lines: 17
Keywords: Marketing???
Xref: linus net.arch:1116 net.unix:4160

In article <843@sdcsvax.UUCP> darrell@sdcsvax.UUCP (Darrell Long) writes:
>*** REPLACE AT&T's MARKETING STAFF ***
>
>	A wise friend of mine once said that if AT&T ever hopes to be
>the giant in the computer industry that it hopes to be, that it would
>do well to buy IBM's marketing department.  Now, I see that my friend
>is probably right.
>-- 
>Darrell Long
>USENET: sdcsvax!darrell
Yes, it might become a "giant" in the computer industry, but it
would produce bad computers (like IBM micros). I have much more
respect for AT&T than IBM, and this is probably due to AT&T's lack
of an opressive marketing department.
				Mark Galassi
				...tektronix!reed!rosalia
{These opinions are my own and should be everybody elses :-) }