Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 2/6/85; site rocksvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!princeton!rocksvax!dw
From: dw@rocksvax.UUCP (Don Wegeng)
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: CD players
Message-ID: <1211@rocksvax.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 30-May-85 12:58:22 EDT
Article-I.D.: rocksvax.1211
Posted: Thu May 30 12:58:22 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 31-May-85 04:15:35 EDT
References: <145@utflis.UUCP>
Reply-To: dw@rocksvax.UUCP (Don Wegeng)
Organization: Xerox: Henrietta, NY
Lines: 27
Summary: 

In article <145@utflis.UUCP> molnar@utflis.UUCP (Tom Molnar) writes:
>Funny thing was, that when I listened to the Mission, Nakamichi, Philips,
>Yamaha, Luxman etc CD players - I could *definitly* hear a difference.
>Now am I imagining this? Or have others found significant differences
>in the sounds of the various CD players? 

As I've stated on the net before, when I was shopping for a cd player
I had the chance to A-B several models from several price ranges. I
found that the Mission sounded best. I bought the NAD for I found it
to be the best sounding unit in my price range.

Given that many people cannot hear any difference between, say, amps
it does not surprise me that the same statement is made about cd players.
I've noticed, though, that many of the consumer stereo magazines seem
to be moving away from their previous stand that cd players sound pretty
much the same (Audio comes to mind).

/Don

-- 

"Old age and treachery will overcome youth and skill."

arpa:	Wegeng.Henr@Xerox.ARPA
csnet:	Wegeng.Henr@Xerox.ARPA
ns:	Wegeng:Wbst207V:Xerox
uucp:	{allegra,amd,decvax!rochester,princeton}!rocksvax!dw